Sunday, September 18, 2011

Man, Machine, And Melody

Drive(2011)
Directed By Nicolas Winding Refn
"Drive" is car-chase film with so much excessive style that the fact that there are very few car chases or scenes involving driving at all for that matter is excusable. From Nicolas Winding Refn, "Drive" is the first American film for the Danish director whose last films "Valhalla Rising" and "Bronson", were both examples of apex genre film making. This time around Ryan Gosling stars as the unnamed driver, part time mechanic and part time Hollywood stunt-man, and moonlighting as getaway driver, whose credo is that he is only involved in any crime as long as he is driving and not a second more. This kind of motto is only of interest, because the detachment Gosling shows to his fellow criminals is the same face he shows to everyone he interacts with. “I’m yours in that window and not a second after”. This changes when Gosling meets a neighbor (Carey Mulligan) and her son, a neighborly ride after some car trouble leads, to a slowly and quietly blooming fondness between the two, until it’s revealed her husband is going to be released from prison in a week. This sets off a chain of events involving ex-Hollywood producers of “eighties action movies” turned mobsters, a suitcase full of cash, a heist gone wrong, etc. What makes “Drive” worth seeing? Why not just watch any of "The Transporter" or "The Fast And The Furious" franchises? “Drive” has style, like all of Refn’s films not style over substance, but style as substance. The music, the costumes (Gosling’s jacket a gaudier homage, among many, to Kenneth Anger’s “Lucifer Rising”), the Los Angeles setting, and the cars themselves take on real weight in the film. The music above all, makes the film though. According to Gosling the music “…is this dark disco sound: hyper-romantic dance music that has a menacing undertone.”, and Refn “If this movie was a piece of music it would be Kraftwerk because Driver is half man, half machine. Kraftwerk was about taking technology and make it melodic, so that was the right approach. We wanted electronic but not retro.”. Bubbly synths and soft female vocals, act as the perfect compliment to the driver’s sun bleached and neon streaked drives down L.A.s “100,000” streets. It’s important to remember though that Gosling’s character is not playing the songs that form the films soundtrack (it seems as if he prefers silence actually). The film itself produces the music, which though sounding great, doesn’t make emotional sense to the film until later on, when we finally get glimpses of the driver’s naivete. “I don’t eat I don’t sleep I do nothing but think of you”, croons “Desire” on the track “Under Your Spell”, as Gosling and the neighbor think each other. Like Tsai-Ming Liang’s musical-hybrids the pop songs subtitle what the love-lorn characters wish they could say to each other. By the time the credits role to a song called (with its title sung in refrain during the fade to black) “A Real Hero”, there is little doubt, that the sugary music is the very sound of the driver’s heartbeat beneath the roar of engines and tire screech. Man, machine, and melody. The Driver himself is a largely silent character, bashful and childlike to some “I thought you could take the money and go away, and that….I could uh come with you and…protect you?”, but prone to outbursts of violence, as if they were always lurking beneath the surface waiting to emerge. One scene finding him masked Michael Myers style on a beach, seems to confirm than for all his strong silent type charm, there is something not right quite right about him. Gosling deserves top marks for playing being able to play innocent puppy-dog and blood soaked terror with such command. All of the performances in “Drive” are good though, Ron Pearlman seems right at home as a mob boss, Bryan Cranston does well in his bit as the washed up mentor, but Christina Hendricks is under-used. Still it’s rather telling about the seriousness of “Drive” that it would rather use a bomb-shell like Hendricks to keep us on our toes, rather than introduce us to her bending over a motorcycle Michael Bay style or something equally exploitative. Though I wouldn't have minded a little exploitation here to be honest...alas... Albert Brooks is also surprising here as our hero’s main nemeses, an ex producer of “shitty 80’s action movies” of the type that “Drive” is signifying or as Refn says, " “Drive” also belongs to the genre of L.A. noir and to this niche genre, which is called neon noir and a lot of those films are from around 1979 to 1984.” Though the film did remind me of Los Angeles thriller’s like “To Live And Die In LA” (which also features an electronic pop soundtrack from Wang Chung) and “Vice Squad” where the mask/beach scene in “Drive” is as strange as the funeral fetish scene of the later. Never did the film feel derivative of anything it was compared too, especially the likes of “Bullit” and “Vanishing Point”. “Drive” is less like “Point Blank” and more like “The Limey”, “Point Blank’s” younger modern nephew wearing it's Uncle's vintage clothes.In “Drive” the driving is more of a symbol for Gosling’s character’s shark-like loneliness which is only alleviated when he has passengers, someone to share the ride with. The L.A. river scene recalling the out-of -idiom joy rides from "Butch Cassidy And The Sundance Kid", and the warmth there in. The golden scorpion on the back of Gosling’s jacket cannot be ignored though, “you heard the story of the scorpion right? Well your friend didn’t make it across the river”. Just as it is not the scorpion’s nature to abide fellow travelers, so to is the driver fated to destroy anything that gets close to him, regardless of intentions. “Drive” may not be as bizarre or existential as something supposedly dedicated to Alejandro Jodorowsky might lead you to believe, but it’s a compelling thriller that will make you jump when a gun does go off, rather that turn automatic fire into white noise as more standard fare might this past summer has. I don’t think I’ve ever felt embarrassed for a hero the way I did when Gosling says “…I could protect you”, staring at his feet like a ten year old caught red-handed. That kind of vulnerability is rare in an action film, even rarer in a "super-hero" film as this has been referred to, by it's cast. I also don’t think there’s been a better closing scene/song match-up since “The Breakfast Club” or “Dogville”. Like so many wounded heroes in westerns riding off into the sunset, it’s easy to imagine Gosling’s driver, mouthing the words “real human being” to himself while his guts are literally spilling out all over the upholstery, until he becomes just another set of tail and headlights amongst 100,000 neon streets streaking their way across the blacktop into eternity.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Nostalgia's Revenge

Super 8(2011)
Directed By J. J. Abrams

The zombie film the kids were making before the train blew up had more going for it than anything that actually happens in "Super 8". "Mars Attacks" is retro sci-fi at full throttle, this film is a nostalgia trip for fans of classic Steven Spielberg films. "You've gotta put that scene in, so that later on the audience cares who get's eaten" a young director says to his crew, a lame brained excuse for the useless funeral prologue, melancholy lead and his forced star-crossed puppy wuv. When we finally see what all the fuss is about it's a beast with a tediously predictable origin (like something a unimaginative ten year old would come up with) and even worse it looks exactly like the beast from Cloverfield, just smaller and less intimidating. No effort seems to have gone into designing an original looking monster at all, which if there is a bare minimum I want out of a monster movie its just that.I enjoyed most of "Lost", "Fringe", and liked "Cloverfield", but "Star Trek" was awful and this even worse. The kids were lame except for the little pyro, the camaraderie and chemistry of kid team-ups like "Monster Squad", "The Goonies", and to a lesser extent Robert Rodriguez's wonky but still unique, "Spy Kids" series, is absent here, and the dead parent drama that is supposed to connect all the dramatic plots together, rings hollow and cloying like the even flatter and blander "Monsters".The train sequence is the only portion of the film that approaches genuine spectacle, the rest is just non-threatening and often barely palpable suspense. If you've forgotten what a good monster movie for the whole family can be re-watch "The Host".
Not to mention the great giant-fighting mockumentaries "Troll Hunter" and "Big Man Japan". The hype machine behind "Cloverfield" when all was said and done seemed appropriate, while in "Super 8" the mystery is a let down, because it's basically "Cloverfield" with some hallmark card and completely unearned "E.T." sentimentality, that doesn't promote the humanism (of the film's it apes) so much as justify the cynicism that leads audiences to "Rampage" and "The Human Centipede" to get their thrills.
"X-Men: First Class" and especially the surprising "Attack The Block" were retro, youthful, relevant, dramatic, had unique action set pieces, and didn't need to explain to us why we are supposed to be care about a character, it made us feel it.
Compare the openings sequences of these three films, and its easy to see why Super 8 goes so wrong. Its restrained tone of domestic does not sharpen or highlight the domestic drama its just hopelessly anchored by it. I was hoping the jolly fat kid would have been the lead, his crush on the lead actress could have been cute and offered opportunities for much needed lightness. Instead with the mop topped sad kid she gets to emote about dark secrets and second hand guilt. What an adventure. I never thought I would say this but Micheal Bay would have made this a film worth seeing, it might not be good, but it would at least be worth seeing.
"Super 8" is not worth seeing.

War Horse

13 Assassins(2010)
Directed By Takashi Miike

Takashi Miike is back in rare form. I was mildly amused by his Zebraman series and Yatterman and laughed out loud more than a few times during Detective Story, but Miike had been overdue for something truly grand, Sukiyaki Western Django's notwithstanding. He seems to have found a measure of cross-over success in that most quintesentially Japanese of genre's the Samurai film, relatively fresh territory for the workaholic auteur who cut his teeth on Yazuki and bleakly humored trangressive freakouts like Miike has. The film retains some of his usual genre distortions and deconstructions (like a gleefully nihilistic Robert Altman), specifically in the perverse Lord the assassins are retained to eliminate and his disdain for the samurai who serve him and their blind eyed obedience. He is a typical Miike character an aristocratic rapist, with a childlike fascination with violence, who asks in awe of the carnage around him "The age of war...was it always like this?" Paul Veerhoven's anti-military inter-galactic space war "Starship Troopers" is Miike's favorite film, and its influence shows in 13 Assasins as much as Akira Kurosawa's Seven Samurai, which have been mentioned repeatedly in multiple reviews. The final hour or so of this film is one continuous battle/fight/chase scene and it's a thing of cinematic joy to behold and really the main reason to see this film. And then to see it again, and again. There is no choppy CGI on display here just old fashioned martial arts mayhem and daring stuntcraft, explosive as the arterial spray of a kitana to the jugular vein. When it comes to action films they rarely get better than this.